ABSTRACT
The incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has increased as a result of improved local control rate and survival rate. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been proven to reduce the incidence of brain metastases and improve survival rate in patients with NSCLC. However, the value of PCI for NSCLC is still controversial. This paper reviews the progress of the efficacy and adverse reactions after PCI treatment for patients with NSCLC.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of lymph node involved-field irradiation (IFI) and elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for treatment of esophageal cancer among Asian populations. Methods The randomized controlled trials and retrospective analyses of Asian esophageal cancer patients treated by IFI and ENI were retrieved by computer in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang database. The last retrieval time was May 2018. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the clinical efficacy, adverse reactions and failure modes were selected in each study. A Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 software to compare the advantages and disadvantages of IFI group and ENI group in treatment of Asian esophageal cancer patients. Results Eventually, a total of 18 domestic and foreign literature that meet the standards (6 randomized controlled trials, 12 retrospective analyses) were included, with a total of 2220 patients. There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate, the local control rate, the local/regional failure rate, the distant metastasis rate, the intra-field recurrence rate, and the field recurrence rate between the IFI group and the ENI group (all P>0.05). The overall failure rate of ENI group was slightly lower than that of IFI group (P= 0.05). The incidence of radiation pneumonitis in ENI group was higher than that in IFI group (P= 0.004), and the incidence of radiation esophagitis was higher than that in IFI group (P< 0.01). Conclusion For Asian patients with esophageal cancer, ENI has no obvious advantage compared with IFI, including the increase of adverse reactions.
ABSTRACT
Objective At present, short-course radiotherapy ( SCRT) with immediate surgery and long-course chemoradiotherapy ( LCRT ) with delayed surgery are extremely important regimens in the treatment of rectal cancer. In this meta-analysis, the clinical efficacy and safety were statistically compared between two regimes. Methods Literatures related to SCRT and LCRT including randomized controlled studies and clinical studies were searched from Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure ( CNKI) and Wanfang database with regard to SCRT with immediate surgery or LCRT with delayed surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Ten studies were finally selected including 5 randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the RO resection rate, T downstaging rate, pathological complete response ( pCR) rate in the LCRT group were significantly higher than those in the SCRT group. The incidence rate of adverse events in the LCRT group was higher compared with that in the SCRT group. The sphincter-preservation rate, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, disease-free survival rate, overall survival, late toxicity and postoperative complications did not significantly differ between two groups ( all P>0.05) . Conclusions Compared with SCRT, LCRT can increase the T downstaging rate, R0 resection rate and pCR rate, whereas elevate the incidence rate of acute adverse events. LCRT exerts no significant effect upon overall postoperative complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a RP-HPLC method for the determination of psoralen and isopsoralen in Qianggu Capsules.Methods An Agilent C18(4.6 mm?250 mm,5 ?m)column was used.The methyl-water(45:55) was used as the mobile phase.The flow rate was 1.0 mL?min-1.The determination wavelength was at 246 nm.Results The linear range was 0.08～0.80 ?g,for psoralen,r=0.999 8,the average recovery rate was 99.3 %,RSD=1.4 %(n=5),and for isopsoralen,r=0.999 9,the average recovery rate was 98.5 %,RSD=0.8 %(n=5).The linear equation was Y=7 365.9X-102.7 for psoralen and Y=7 556.0X-65.3 for isopsoralen.Conclusion The method is simple,reliable,accurate,and can be applied to control the quality of Qianggu Capsules.